Guest post: Cod plz!
We are pleased to announce another guest post, from right here in seal-clubbin’ Canada!
_____________
Cod plz!
by Mojofooka
So a federal advisory panel urges the lives of 70 000 grey seals off the east coast of Canada to be culled. Why, you ask?
The Basic Gist of It
1. Humans want fish
2. Humans fish for fish
3. Humans want more fish
4. Humans develop SUPER EFFECTIVE technology and techniques to fish faster for more fish
5. Humans get lots of fish
6. Humans find there is not much fish left
7. THEREFORE: the appropriate response is to kill off the majority of the nearby grey seal population
…there is a serious logic disconnect along the way.
Just to clarify, the fish in question are cod. Anyways, as of today, the commercial cod fishing industry on Canada’s east coast has been inactive for over 17 years. I do credit humans for suspending commercial cod fishing in 1993, because at least it gives the indication that humans were acknowledged as somewhat relevant to the tremendously low cod populations. Despite this lull in human fishing activities, however, cod populations are now at a record low.
The Fisheries Resource Conservation Council (FRCC) desperately wanted to explain the lack of cod population recovery to find some basis for an idea to kick-start the population growth/revive the cod fishing industry. This advisory council then brilliantly noted that 1. grey seals eat cod, and 2. the local grey seal population had increased 30-fold since the 1960s. Armed with these powerful realizations, the FRCC concluded that the party at fault therefore must have been the grey seals, and proceeded to suggest that killing 70 000 of the aforementioned seals would liberate the cod from its population growth inhibitions. In fact, an additional bonus was even given: it would be a superbly interesting large-scale experiment to perform.
Wow. So that’s all it takes to make a rampant massacre sound like a great idea.
Does the FRCC assume that the only influential factor on cod population is predation? And that only one of its predators is responsible? The assumption isn’t directly stated, but it certainly seems implied when the FRCC’s proposition only targets one predator – the grey seal. But how about other considerations? Perhaps with cod populations depleted, their prey had much fewer hungry cod chasing them… so could it be possible that other hungry species, formerly outcompeted by the massive cod populations, are now able to flourish off the cod’s prey? The now-flourishing species could be consuming much of the cod’s precious food, thus impeding cod populations from rebounding even after humans suspended commercial fishing. Or how about the recorded fact that prior to overfishing, large populations of both grey seals and cod existed simultaneously? Imagine that. If seals and cod are actually able to coexist, it’s likely that the grey seals aren’t as much of a barrier to cod population growth as they are accused of being. Oh, and just as a reminder, seals and humans definitely aren’t the only cod-consuming species.
Really though, killing 70 000 seals to check if it will make cod populations skyrocket… Well then, I guess I’m off to slaughter the majority of Canadian bears, just in case they’re responsible for keeping salmon from having lots of babies! Simply brilliant. Let me impart some wisdom that my statistics teacher has permanently impressed into my mind: Correlation does not equal causation. Even if cod populations did shoot up again after wiping out over two-thirds of the grey seal population, it would be neigh impossible to know that the sole factor was predation from grey seals. In marine ecology, there is no “food chain” – it is in fact called a “food web” because of the staggering complexity of who-eats-who, and in all honesty, the population boom of the grey seals living off the east coast of Canada may really have little relevance to cod. Considering that the FRCC’s suggested bloodbath/experiment isn’t being performed in a controlled environment, there are way too many confounding variables for this experiment in the deep blue sea.
Possibly the most charming part the suggestion from the FRCC to cull 70 000 grey seals is that it was made in a report titled “ Towards Recovered and Sustainable Groundfish Fisheries in Eastern Canada”. Apparently sustainable fisheries only need to concern themselves with the sustainability of species sold in the supermarket.
Well, there’s probably isn’t a realistically accessible button to suddenly make cod populations go bursting forth in glorious fit of reproduction… but even if there was, I’d say killing grey seals isn’t it.
Filed under: science | 6 Comments
Tags: cod, critical thinking, fisheries, fishing, logic, seal, seal clubbing, seal cull, sustainability



Well, at least you all will have seal meat to eat when the cod population fails to respond. Gotta look at the bright side of things…
Mmm… Maybe the Japanese restaraunts in Canada will come up with some kind of seal sushi and sashimi… Or maybe the Chinese restaurants will start making seal fin soup instead of shark fin soup~
This makes me sad ): we are such a bad species
Pretty depressing!
How do you feel about seal hunting in general? Is it about the seals, or is it bout the condemnation of one species over the other?
I agree though, it seems a ridiculous bit of policy and a very odd way to go about it – particularly in light of the international heat that Canada comes under because of the seal hunts.
I’m tempted to say that I dislike it because it is the condemnation of one species over another, but then again I will mercilessly swat flies and kill ants, yet I won’t lay a finger on ladybugs or spider because I like them, so I’m guilty of the same favouring.
I think I’m against this seal hunt because it’s a slaughter fest that wouldn’t even be able to provide conclusive findings from the “experiment” because of all the confounds that are simply impossible to control.
As for hunting in general (seals or otherwise) on the scale of individuals/small groups of people doing the hunting, I’m only against it if 1. the species being hunted is endangered or at risk of becoming endangered or 2. the animals that are killed will be wasted (i.e. most or all of it will just thrown away after being killed; not eaten or used for any purpose). So for the most part, I’m not really against hunting.
And yes, I suppose Canada is fine with having a reputation for being courteous and kind, except not towards seals. Oh, and we were incapable of reducing our emissions and had to withdraw from the Kyoto protocol. I guess this country is just not doing quite as well on the environmental side?